Archive for July, 2007

Jul 31 2007

Profile Image of Grant
Grant

When Image is Everything

Filed under Quotations

From The Subtle Power of Spiritual Abuse (Johnson and VanVonderen), p. 133:

Let’s imagine for a moment that I am a pastor whose marriage is shaky. I’m altogether unhappy with my life, and my relationship with God dried up months ago. If I’m in a system where “how things look” is what matters, I can’t possibly disclose any of the realities–it would not look good. So I pretend. My wife and I come through the door of the church arm in arm, slap on happy faces and sing with gusto. But the songs no longer have any meaning to us. We know deep in our spirit that something is radically wrong, but the thought of saying that out loud is terrifying. Everyone else here is healthy and happy. They could not possibly have the questions we have about God, or be struggling in their marriages, or ever get depressed. We are aware that something is wrong, but afraid of being ridiculed if we disclose the truth. We make a choice, and the choice is clear in a “how-things-look” system: You maintain a false image, and call it the abundant life.

The tragedy of all this is that you get no help for what’s really going on in your life…. When image is everything, when “how things look” is what matters, spiritual abuse is the next step, because you cannot help but demand performance from others when you are working so hard yourself.

One response so far

Jul 31 2007

Profile Image of Grant
Grant

Presented without Comment…

Filed under Ideas

From China to Iran, Web Diarists Are Challenging Censors

No responses yet

Jul 30 2007

Profile Image of Grant
Grant

Quilting Backwards

Filed under Changes

It’s a testament to my wife, really. She’s so completely immersed in her discipline that it’s pretty much impossible to see where she begins and it ends. My Camille is a productive rhetorician at the cellular level (and for that, her professor Bob Ivie at Indiana University must be busting his buttons). Everything she sees, hears, thinks, says or writes is funnelled first through her rhetorical sense. It’s so fundamental a part of who she is, it’s rubbed off on me. I’m a better thinker, speaker, and writer thanks to her. And isn’t that the best kind of teacher? She’s not teaching by lecturing; she’s teaching by living.

One of the concepts she’s taught me is that of “Quilting Backwards.” To put it in a real-world framework, here’s what an honest-to-goodness quilter has to say about it:

I believe that quilters of today learn to quilt backwards. We learn the rules about quilting BEFORE we quilt. I think we should make some quilts first, then learn the rules later–and only if we want to. My message is a simple one, but I think people like to hear it over and over again: Have fun. Don’t be afraid to be spontaneous. Laugh at your mistakes. Give yourself permission to love your work, even if it isn’t perfect. Understand that if you give a quilt to someone you love, he/she will think of you and cherish it always, even if your points don’t match.

When a rhetorician borrows this term, it’s used to describe the argumentative tendency to arrive at a conclusion before you’ve begun the process of analyzing the evidence in front of you. You already know the result you wish to get, and so you hedge your thought processes so that, regardless of what inconvenient truths you encounter, you’re able to arrive at a conclusion that fits within your predetermined paradigm. It’s obviously not a very sound way to think, but it sure does make life simpler: no messy conundrums to resolve.

Isn’t it interesting how messy a process God’s grace is? It insists that we live our lives in a way that accommodates the inconsistencies in those around us (and Heaven knows, we all have inconsistencies). Romans 14:1-12 speaks directly to that kind of messiness:

Welcome with open arms fellow believers who don’t see things the way you do. And don’t jump all over them every time they do or say something you don’t agree with—even when it seems that they are strong on opinions but weak in the faith department. Remember, they have their own history to deal with. Treat them gently.

For instance, a person who has been around for a while might well be convinced that he can eat anything on the table, while another, with a different background, might assume he should only be a vegetarian and eat accordingly. But since both are guests at Christ’s table, wouldn’t it be terribly rude if they fell to criticizing what the other ate or didn’t eat? God, after all, invited them both to the table. Do you have any business crossing people off the guest list or interfering with God’s welcome? If there are corrections to be made or manners to be learned, God can handle that without your help.

Or, say, one person thinks that some days should be set aside as holy and another thinks that each day is pretty much like any other. There are good reasons either way. So, each person is free to follow the convictions of conscience.

What’s important in all this is that if you keep a holy day, keep it for God’s sake; if you eat meat, eat it to the glory of God and thank God for prime rib; if you’re a vegetarian, eat vegetables to the glory of God and thank God for broccoli. None of us are permitted to insist on our own way in these matters. It’s God we are answerable to—all the way from life to death and everything in between—not each other. That’s why Jesus lived and died and then lived again: so that he could be our Master across the entire range of life and death, and free us from the petty tyrannies of each other.

So where does that leave you when you criticize a brother? And where does that leave you when you condescend to a sister? I’d say it leaves you looking pretty silly—or worse. Eventually, we’re all going to end up kneeling side by side in the place of judgment, facing God. Your critical and condescending ways aren’t going to improve your position there one bit. Read it for yourself in Scripture:

   “As I live and breathe,” God says,
      “every knee will bow before me;
   Every tongue will tell the honest truth
      that I and only I am God.”

So tend to your knitting. You’ve got your hands full just taking care of your own life before God.

<sarcasm> 

Paul came pretty close to warning us away from this same thing, but he missed the mark by using the term “knitting.” That’s really terribly unfortunate. Doesn’t he know that the correct term is “quilting?” Matters of emphasis like these are of vitally paramount importance.

</sarcasm>

2 responses so far

Jul 29 2007

Profile Image of Grant
Grant

Caring too much

Filed under Changes

You’ve heard of PostSecret, I’m sure, a place where people anonymously unburden themselves by “confessing” their secrets to a stranger on a postcard. What people feel they must say is often borne of shockingly raw emotion; but it’s always candidly truthful.

With that background, consider this submission:

think.jpg

I don’t know what those chemical symbols mean, so maybe my impressions are off-base. But with things as they have been lately, I’m viewing this as someone who almost bypassed what I knew to be right because I was too worried about what others might think. So now consider with me the contrasting freedom that Paul describes for us in Galatians 2:15-21:

We Jews know that we have no advantage of birth over “non-Jewish sinners.” We know very well that we are not set right with God by rule-keeping but only through personal faith in Jesus Christ. How do we know? We tried it—and we had the best system of rules the world has ever seen! Convinced that no human being can please God by self-improvement, we believed in Jesus as the Messiah so that we might be set right before God by trusting in the Messiah, not by trying to be good.

Have some of you noticed that we are not yet perfect? (No great surprise, right?) And are you ready to make the accusation that since people like me, who go through Christ in order to get things right with God, aren’t perfectly virtuous, Christ must therefore be an accessory to sin? The accusation is frivolous. If I was “trying to be good,” I would be rebuilding the same old barn that I tore down. I would be acting as a charlatan.

What actually took place is this: I tried keeping rules and working my head off to please God, and it didn’t work. So I quit being a “law man” so that I could be God’s man. Christ’s life showed me how, and enabled me to do it. I identified myself completely with him. Indeed, I have been crucified with Christ. My ego is no longer central. It is no longer important that I appear righteous before you or have your good opinion, and I am no longer driven to impress God. Christ lives in me. The life you see me living is not “mine,” but it is lived by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. I am not going to go back on that.

Is it not clear to you that to go back to that old rule-keeping, peer-pleasing religion would be an abandonment of everything personal and free in my relationship with God? I refuse to do that, to repudiate God’s grace. If a living relationship with God could come by rule-keeping, then Christ died unnecessarily.

No responses yet

Jul 28 2007

Profile Image of Grant
Grant

Is it “be ye right?” Or is it “be ye kind?”

Filed under Changes

This thing has me by the shirt-collar. I can’t shake it.

It’s becoming clearer and clearer to me how fundamentally (no pun intended) transforming this process of sanctification is in a believer’s life, in my life. I am overcome by the liberating realization that God loves me right now as much as He ever has or ever will, and that His love for me, thanks to Christ’s forgiving work of grace on my behalf, is completely independent of anything I may do or not do. This one truth is new to me every day, and I’m rejoicing in the new-found freedom that it’s bringing me. God reached down to me when I was dead in my sin and chose me as His own. There was no goodness on my part that motivated Him, and there is no merit of my own that holds me in that position; it is my eternal, loving God alone who holds me and sustains me, who protects me and who guides me. And why is that? Because He loves me. Incredible! The more I learn that lesson, the more I am free to live a free life of service to my Savior, and the more I am at liberty to love those around me without seeking to control, manipulate, or judge.

I’m pretty sure that this is what the Bible’s been about ever since it was written. This is where the rubber meets the road for the Christian. So how is it that, while trying to do right, act right, think right, be right, we’ve lost sight of this most basic of the commandments? (Matthew 22:34-40) We’re so concerned with being right, we’ve forgotten that the fundamental law that drives our faith and from which everything else springs is first and foremost love.

No responses yet

Jul 26 2007

Profile Image of Grant
Grant

“If we don’t change direction soon, we’ll end up where we’re going.”

Filed under Changes, Quotations

This quotation by comedian Irwin Corey pretty much sums it all up. If you don’t change direction, you’re going to wind up exactly where you’re headed. Brilliant, eh?

So Camille and I are leaving BJU. It’s an awful nexus because we’re so invested in the institution, in our respective departments, in our students and colleagues, in our way of life. So do we stay, living at odds with our conscience, or do we go, leaving what’s become comfortably safe, familiar, easy? The very institution that’s ever-so-politely holding our exit door open taught us years ago to live with forthrightness before God and man. How is it that comfort and convenience could now excuse us from living by those same principles?

That the suddenly-thrust-upon-us questions of “Where to go? What to do? How to live?” are swirling around in our heads is sad to acknowledge. Have the two people we were just seven years ago changed so much? We two who had fairly adroitly negotiated the swim upstream at a Big 10 university; we two who took on one of the most intimidating of tasks, arm-in-arm, ready to face the onslaught? Have we become so flabby in character in these intervening years that the consequence of obeying the Holy Spirit’s clear direction is actually something that gives us pause? God help us.

And yet, by God’s grace, we’re leaving. Leaving BJU. Two people who have defended it when attacked and who sought to fulfill our promise of alerting it in error, we’re leaving. With the decision made (for us), we stepped out because (S)omeone decided it was time.  And when the soles of our feet struck the water, we watched with wonder as God, in fewer than two weeks and well past the deadline for such employment decisions to be made, graciously provided an associate professorship at a Christian University nearly as close to our house as BJU is. Interesting, isn’t it, that seven years ago He arranged for us to live so far from campus in the first place? Everyone else lived so close and wondered why in the world we’d chosen to live so far away. Now we know.

 To borrow from my dear wife (and a little bit from Ecclesiastes):

There is a time for everything…

   … a time to be born and a time to die,
   … a time to plant and a time to uproot,
   … a time to kill and a time to heal,
   … a time to tear down and a time to build,
   … a time to weep and a time to laugh,
   … a time to mourn and a time to dance,
   … a time to scatter stones and a time to gather them,
   … a time to embrace and a time to refrain,
   … a time to search and a time to give up,
   … a time to keep and a time to throw away,
   … a time to tear and a time to mend,   
   … a time to be silent and a time to speak,
   … a time to love and a time to hate,
   … a time for war and a time for peace.

He has made everything beautiful in His time.

10 responses so far

Jul 25 2007

Profile Image of Grant
Grant

Welcome!

Filed under Welcome

Welcome to my new blog! I hope you enjoy what you find here. Grab yourself a cup of coffee and sit for a spell.

No responses yet